Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Kennet & Avon Lock #71


JamesT

Recommended Posts

Or the wonders of large format.

IMG_0002.thumb.jpg.4718dbb40d9d9678ea7b42a9479d502c.jpg

Taken with the Intrepid 5x4 camera, and the 180mm Xenar at f/16, exposure 1/5 on Fomapan 200.

I posted this one here rather than in one of the challenges as I wanted to show a couple of details as well. These are at the full resolution of the scan, I don't know whether the limit is the (rather old) lens, my ability to focus or the capabilities of the scanner.

The hidden angler

IMG_0002-c2.jpg.a422c9bb402168a8c24377697e007f79.jpg

The leaky gate:

IMG_0002-c1.jpg.126a713286b77d6d550d182eefc25b9b.jpg

Link to comment

Excellent James, now that I've seen the enlargements I can see them in the first image. And well done on persevering and continuing to use all these weird and wonderful film cameras, I think very few would have the time and patience these days....

Link to comment

Thanks everyone.

FWIW, the raw scans are about 77MPix. Scanned at 6400dpi and binned down by a factor 3 in the scanning software.

But even at TIPF/Flickr resolutions there is a feeling of fine structure that I don't see in 35mm or digital images (MF comes in between).

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...