Paul80

Hi There are probably quite a few options and a quick google search will revel quite a few Here is one such option http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/WHD-A2-1TB-BLK-13-P-UK-Asus-Wireless-Hard-Drive-and-SD-Card-Reader-OneTouch-NFC-/311891277842 Paul

If you plan and doing this often then it's often recommended that one of the Dyesub printers is a better choice than an inkjet. Don't know what they cost though, to buy or run but assume the long term running costs must be lower than inkjet for it to be recommended so often.

Problem solved Turned out the Free Epson Print Layout software did everything I was after and did I mention it was free Paul

Hi all Anyone got any recomendations for a printing Package Software that supports ICC Profiles Photoshop used to but no longer has the built in module QImage does but is too complicated for a simpleton like me Epson easy print and windows print module does the package printing I need but does not support ICC profiles Don't need anything complicated just want to print multiple pictures on one page but with ICC profile control. Thanks for any recomendations Paul

My system is also showing countless failed installation attemps, even left the PC on all day in the hope that it would come down whilst I was out at work but alas no. Now trying to download the ISO file direct from Microsoft but its painfully slow, only downloading 15% in an hour. I await it with baited breath

Its also often proven that when it comes to advertising the camera does lie and so do the add agencies, just because they say these where taken by ordinary iPhone user using their iPhones does not make it so. Good images though, regardless of who actually took them and with which camera.

once you have something on the screen and you can do nothing you have already allowed your machine to be infected, these lock Trojans are getting quite popular these days. Turn your machine off and on another machine google the name that comes up with the screen lock warning, then follow the instructions given to remove it from your machine. Warning make sure yours is disconnected from the internet when you turn it on and if its a windows based machine find out how to boot it into safe mode, anti virus/mailware/trojan software often works better if the machine is in safe mode. Dont ever contact the company that infected your machine, EVER.

One good reason to keep your Anti virus/Mailware/ etc software updated and running, although most of these things get through because some users unwittingly invite them in when they click on links either on unsafe websites or links in unsafe e.mails. Never ever ever accept any offer of a free upgrade, unless you went looking for it and know were you are getting it from. No one ever send out e.mails offering updates they are always done from within a program. if in doubt google the site first if its dodgy you will quickly find out.

Put the cat in the freezer for half an hour, that should slow him down

Spoilt be the two anoraks though, still I suppose the photographer should be grateful they were not wearing Red because they do in all of my shots Paul

But then again if shooting speed is a big issue how long before everyone is going down the 4k video route 25/30 FPS for as long as your card lasts and then just print the frame you want, Its been done already so how long before actual still photography as we know it is a thing of the past. Not as long as some would hope I bet. Paul

Actually as the Camera has to apply processing to the JPEG it can be quicker shooting RAW only as nothing is done to the image with JPEG not only does it have to apply all the cameras settings but also apply the JPEG resizing algorithms, all that can slow the process. As for space saving with memory cards being as cheap as chips these days what's the point, my 64gb card can hold 3000 RAW files and they cost less than £20 each so space saving is not an issue. For me with my cameras I find shooting RAW quicker than Shooting RAW plus JPEG which if you actually read what I wrote, was what I said, not that JPEG on its own was slower than RAW but RAW Plus JPEG was slower than RAW on its own.

Well the main camera that day, until tomorrows camera arrives in the post and then the next and so it would go on. This is why we will never win the lottery

I have three old Jessops bags, They are all they same range just different sizes. One holds everything, one holds one camera and a couple of lens's and there is one in the middle if I know what I will be shooting. As such most of the time I take the big one but only use one camera and a couple of lenses and my back always regrets it. Paul

Hi For a long time I also used to shoot RAW + JPEG and printed from the JPEG as it was a quicker process, only reverting to the RAW file if I needed to do more processing. Nowadays most software can handle RAW files just as quickly, if not quicker Photoshop, Lightroom etc so now I only shoot in RAW. Its also better if you are shooting action as the camera is slowed down by processing JPEG files along with RAW, RAW on their own results in much quicker operation, well it does on my Lumix Cameras, might be different with others, depending on their processors power. Paul