Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Which prime to start with?


Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

lol @ the argument - almost as good as the Nikon versus Canon one! 

 

For six years, on my Nikon D300 (DX), I used both the Nikon 50mm F1.8 and 35mm F1.8.  Both affordable and both great, sharp lenses, the 50mm being slighter sharper in my experience.  I couldn't afford big telephotos nor super-wide lenses (except a Tokina wide-angle bought second-hand).  I found that the two Nikon lenses covered most of my needs - I mainly do portraits (human and pets) and candid/street photography.

 

In March of last year, I treated myself to a D3300, but found it didn't meet my needs for the other type of photography I do: motorsport for my car club.  And the (cheapish) Nikon F1.8 50mm wouldn't focus on the D3300 as it does not have a focussing motor, has to rely on one in the camera, which the D3300 doesn't have.

 

So I bought a Nikon 50mm F1.4 (which does have a focussing motor).  That cost about £280, I think.  And what a cracker of a lens it is - well worth the money for the extra stop.

 

So go for a 50mm and adapt how you take your pictures.  A fast lens and beautiful bokeh - definitely worth a try,  I'm sure you won't regret it,

 

(Anyway, just before I lost my job in November, I swapped the D300 for a D750 full frame.  It's like the D300 in terms of handling, but ten times better.  And full frame with 24mp and the F1.4 lens - what a winning combination!)

Link to comment

If for a DX I suggest the excellent 35mm 1.8, and FX the excellent 50mm 1.8 as first primes. I've just paid for a second hand 85mm 1.8 that I've been lusting after for a few months!

 

As for the D750, I'm very very happy with mine thus far and its seems very popular among wedding photographers (which I am not) who are in some cases moving from D3s and 5DIII to use it. Shame Nikon had yet another manufacturing issue though! At least they are dealing with this one appropriately. 

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...