Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Long Exposure Question


Recommended Posts

So, the last two evenings I've been up on Pendle Hill attempting to do some long exposure light trails, with limited success. Yesterday I thought the movement was caused by me not tighning up the tripod correctly, so today I made sure.... However there still seems to be quite a lot of movement..

Camera Settings: Camera 800D, Lens Canon EF 24-105mm f4, f7.1, iso200, 15secs, -0.7ev, manual focus for both shots, I was also using a remote shutter control.

The 2 images were taken 2 shots apart, as you can see there's a very obvious movement in the first but not the second...

light-trails-9249.jpg

light-trails-9251.jpg

I did come up with a few possible explanations

a/ Car speed caused either ground movement or air turbulence
b/ Tripod leg was touching the car and movement caused by that
c/ Earth spin
d/ Image stablisation was on

Though to be honest I'm a bit mystified as to why it happened on most images but not all....

Link to comment

The IS is on.

On short exposures and unless your tripod is absolutely rock solid I'd leave it on - as soon as the exposures run over a second or so knock it off as it over compensates and creates what you are seeing. I get this almost every time I start doing night shots as I almost always forget to knock it off.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...