fuzzyedges

Heard this on the high street the other day and every other day since time begun at christmas What would our less than fantastic shops do without Noddy Thank the lord for China and a lack of imagination I always thought most crimmy decorations were cheap and chatty but this year they just seem chatty and no longer cheap What I have heard in some other shops is Lou Armstrongs "Is that You Santa Claus" which is 1million times better

Is that the time ?? where is my horlicks

was listening to dire straits on u tube and found a track by mark and tony joe white http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nrku3TplJmM Somehow Ive missed tjw and some of his tracks are really good

The nugget of this disscusion is not is smoking / drinking bad for you but should it be up to you to decide your own life course or should someone else decide it for you I for one prefer to plough my own furrow and do it the best I can with the advice available, rather than having the plough taken off me

My father told me that camel ciggerettes gave away a free razor blade with each packet (could you imagine that today) He assured me it was to be used after smoking one to cut your own throat Phils image reminded me of that

If its true what they say AND I stress if it is true Then the state spends a lot more on the resultant (not in all cases) health issues from smoking than is collected in tax But if I use this argument against smoking I have to use it against non exercising, over eating or even going out in the cold not properly dressed, which then leads me into the area of me paying for my medical treatment because it was my own fault as well as tax So weighing everything up I would vote for better information and some form of legistation for smoking free areas but not to the extent it is now and leave it at that The plain wrapper with the stupid pictures that will be ignored and the entrapenure will clean up on cigerrette cases and the forger has an even easier job As you say with Smoking declining and drinking declining so fuel tax went up strange that I dont smoke by the way By the way dave smoking was incouraged by the goverment in the rationing years to keep up your sugar level?? or was that another load of garbage they fed us

Saw them at a free concert in the east park (or was it west ) at Hull mid to late 60's Never made the mistake of sitting too close to the stage, disgusting habits some of these bands had Do belive Captain Beefheart was on at the same time but the memory dims

How well do you drive??? https://www.youtube....bed/oFkw5JFOmHk

Still am in my 20's Annie its just the shell thats older

Saw them live in a tent at selby, the other group on were Jon Hiesmans colosseum Early days for them even earlier for me

Saturday night fish fry Louis Jordan Wang dang Doodle Koko Taylor Crossroads Robert Johnson Thirties / forties music where most of the modern stuff comes from

Well traveled lad is Boris, some very nice images but as you say some images that make a Yorkshire man look generous

Im more of a stoned bloke

But they still maintain there value (read that as cost not artistic value) and can be sold on later to another art lover? Money is not the value of art Everything is art Its just good or bad art and its all down to you to decide which Money is the investment in something that can be sold later for more or a possesion that has to be owned by someone at any cost for reasons only known by them

Thought provoking But I would think a small detachable unit for the sensor / battery would be in order to keep the price right i.e a lens with a small attachment for the electronics then it becomes an interchangable lens unit As the mobile phone has taken over the portable radios and record players walkmans and mp3's etc its not inconcievable these will become the operating system for the lens How about instead of an ear piece you have an eye piece as a view finder with various buttons on the lens / phone (or touch pads ) transmitted to the eye piece by wireless Its coming and sooner than later the camera has been one shape for too long

Oh yeah brake -------tyre grips----------nose cuts furrow I would stay with 2 , 3, or 4 wheels thank you I will stay with colour damn wrong post

Probably yes I just want the goverment to stop trying to help me into poverty with their half baked ideas

The article should be read in its entirety Here is a reason why credit has been given to this hoax This version of the email includes a link to an article on urban legend site, Snopes.com that provides information about the genuine malware threat discussed above. Unfortunately, it seems that many recipients are clicking the link in the bogus email and, after a cursory glance at the article, falsely concluding that the information in the hoax email is factual. If they were to actually read the Snopes article properly, they would very quickly realize that the information in the hoax message is totally unrelated to the genuine malware threat. In fact, the article quite clearly states that readers should not confuse the genuine threat with the old virus hoaxes. Thus, in spite of what may appear at first glance to be connections to a real malware threat, the information in this hoax email has no basis in fact. Forwarding it is entirely counterproductive because it serves only to spread misinformation and create confusion about the threat posed by the genuine malware emails. If you receive this hoax email please do not forward it to others. And please take a moment to inform the sender that the warning is untrue. This board is hard to work you have to size the type to 14 and above plus change the colour to white for anything to be seen

You should never open an E mail if you suspect it BUT check with this site if you are curious about a hoax Here is the write up about this "Postcard from Hallmark " http://www.hoax-slayer.com/postcard-virus-hoax.shtml

we had a calibrated monitor at school, poor lad had rickets

What makes an image good is the person viewing it If it flows and excites or entertains you then the chances are others will like it as well Technicalities are important in showing your work in the best way but its the person behind the lens that makes the image

All these scares undermine peoples confidance in life it is better to check to see if it is a hoax before passing it on http://www.hoax-slayer.com/cash-back-scam-warning.shtml Hoax slayer is a good start to try and stop false information being spread. So many look credable Here is one that might raise a smile It was circulated to me as genuine Subject: FW: Photos stored in a Kodak Box brownie camera since 1941 awesome PHOTOS STORED IN AN OLD Kodak Box BROWNIE CAMERA Thought you might find these photos very interesting; what quality from 1941. Pearl Harbor photos found in an old Box Brownie stored in a foot locker. THESE PHOTOS ARE FROM A SAILOR WHO WAS ON THE USS QUAPAW ATF-11O. I THINK THEY'RE SPECTACULAR! PEARL HARBOR December 7th, 1941 On Sunday, December 7th, 1941 the Japanese launched a surprise attack against the U.S. Forces stationed at Pearl Harbor , Hawaii . By planning his attack on a Sunday, the Japanese commander Admiral Nagumo, hoped to catch the entire fleet in port. As luck would have it, the Aircraft Carriers and one of the Battleships were not in port. (The USS Enterprise was returning from Wake Island, where it had just delivered some aircraft. The USS Lexington was ferrying aircraft to Midway, and the USS Saratoga and USS Colorado were undergoing repairs in the United States.) In spite of the latest intelligence reports about the missing aircraft carriers (his most important targets), Admiral Nagumo decided to continue the attack with his force of six carriers and 423 aircraft. At a range of 230 miles north of Oahu, he launched the first wave of a two-wave attack. Beginning at 0600 hours his first wave consisted of 183 fighters and torpedo bombers which struck at the fleet in Pearl Harbor and the airfields in Hickam, Kaneohe and Ewa. The second strike, launched at 0715 hours, consisted of 167 aircraft, which again struck at the same targets. At 0753 hours the first wave consisting of 40 Nakajima B5N2 "Kate" torpedo bombers, 51 Aichi D3A1 "Val" dive bombers, 50 high altitude bombers and 43 Zeros struck airfields and Pearl Harbor Within the next hour, the second wave arrived and continued the attack. When it was over, the U.S. losses were: Casualties USA< /st1:country-region> : 218 KIA, 364 WIA. USN: 2,008 KIA, 710 WIA. USMC: 109 KIA, 69 WIA. Civilians: 68 KIA, 35 WIA. TOTAL: 2,403 KIA, 1,178 WIA. ------------------------------------------------- Battleships USS Arizona (BB-39) - total loss when a bomb hit her magazine. USS Oklahoma (BB-37) - Total loss when she capsized and sunk in the harbor. USS California (BB-44) - Sunk at her berth. Later raised and repaired. USS West Virginia (BB-48) - Sunk at her berth. Later raised and repaired. USS Nevada - (BB-36) Beached to prevent sinking. Later repaired. USS Pennsylvania (BB-38) - Light damage. USS Maryland (BB-46) - Light damage. USS Tennessee (BB-43) Light damage. USS Utah (AG-16) - (former battleship used as a target) - Sunk. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cruisers USS New Orleans (CA-32) - Light Damage.. USS San Francisco (CA38) - Light Damage. USS Detroit (CL-8) - Light Damage. USS Raleigh (CL-7) - Heavily damaged but repaired. USS Helena (CL-50) - Light Damage. USS Honolulu (CL-48) - Light Damage.. -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- Destroyers USS Downes (DD-375) - Destroyed. Parts salvaged. USS Cassin - (DD-37 2) Destroyed. Parts salvaged. USS Shaw (DD-373) - Very heavy damage. USS Helm (DD-388) - Light Damage. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Minelayer USS Ogala (CM-4) - Sunk but later raised and repaired. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Seaplane Tender USS Curtiss (AV-4) - Severely damaged but later repaired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Repair Ship USS Vestal (AR-4) - Severely damaged but later repaired. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Harbor Tug USS Sotoyomo (YT-9) - Sunk but later raised and repaired. ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------- Aircraft 188 Aircraft destroyed (92 USN and 92 U.S. Army Air Corps.) I am going to throw away my expensive camera and buy a box brownie if you can get quality like this These photographs are genuine and do show the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. However, they were not found stored in a Kodak Box brownie camera nor were they taken by a sailor on the USS QUAPAW. In fact, the images are US Naval archive photographs taken by different people at various locations around Pearl Harbour at the time of the attack. The photographs form part of the historical image collection available on the Naval Historical Center website.

I am sure there is a B shape in there somewhere

The fuzzy frog is a distant cousin twice removed on the rich side of the family As is the loud mouthed fuzzy frog that jumps all over the place and can talk an image better than he can take one His images are often fuzzy because he focuses with both eyes, one in the view finder and on the people close at hand, to which he can pounce and bore to death We all have relations we are not proud of

No that was art. It is only your perseption of what art is thats out of tune with all the experts The highly paid minority rules always Us we are just plebs and know nowt