Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

JamesT

Member
  • Posts

    1,698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Posts posted by JamesT

  1. Hi Fogey,

    The challenge is that flatbed scanners are not really designed for handling things on the scale of 35mm film. Epson's V800 and V700 do a passable job, as does the HP9000. However a dedicated film scanner (I have a Nikon Coolscan V) will generally be significantly better — but they can't do anything else.

    The Nikon scans at 4000dpi and that is actually meaningful resolution, and gives about a 20Mp scan. Most flatbeds claim higher resolution, but the results don't have that much information. When scanning medium & large formats I scan at the max physical resolution and then bin by a factor 2 (which gives better actual resolution than scanning at half res from the start). I use VueScan, partly because it's the only really usable solution for Linux (Xsane is very hard to use for negatives), but also it's a good deal cheaper and has a better upgrade policy than most others.

    Definitely to be avoided are those little 10Mp cheap photo scanners that scan to an SD card rather than connecting to a PC.

    I've not tried it but scanning with a DSLR (or mirrorless camera) and a holder such as the Pixl-Latr is also an option.

    Hope this is useful,

    James

  2. Thanks,

    @RyewolfIt was actually the only combination I could think of that might work without having to hunt for my rarely-used ND filter, and a lens for the 70D with a 58mm thread. The Bronica has the advantage also of a waist level finder so not looking directly at the Sun.

    • Like 1
  3. Not the best ever shot of the recent partial solar eclipse.

    IMG_0006.thumb.jpg.2cd02c3bad0bf5b6a6b4f8c12e3b1b84.jpg

    Shot with the Bronica ETRS, and a 200mm lens. On FP4+ film with an IR filter, with a bit of a guess for the exposure at 1/125, f/11. Rather surprisingly the combination of normal Pan film + IR filter has resulted in the H-alpha super-granulation being visible. This is quite a severe crop as most of the sky is very under-exposed and just shows dust from the negative.

    • Like 2
  4. On 27/08/2022 at 00:20, Ryewolf said:

    whilst the UK is small compared to the US, it does take quite sometime to travel around

    There is a saying that the British and the Americans will never understand one another because the British think 100 miles is a long way and the Americans think 100 years is a long time.

    • Haha 2
  5. Here are some of the more conventional engine shots from yesterday's visit to Didcot.

    The two express stars (not star class though) were sharing the main line,both seen here passing the mail drop.

    #2999, reconstructed Saint Class "Lady of Legend"

    IMG_1403.thumb.jpg.bfdc6e18e5bae33263b7424600996bf8.jpg

    And #4079 Pendennis Castle

    IMG_1431.thumb.jpg.ba923762b6aea8705ad0edc113e760ce.jpg

    And then ended the afternoon running double header

    IMG_1479.thumb.jpg.4aef41d832f305cb66340607932d9459.jpg

    Meanwhile on the branch line there was Trojan, the 0-4-0 dock shunter from 1897

    IMG_1447.thumb.jpg.d69693a3833c2b745f1b7a82d73a5016.jpg

    and converted to fake FP4+ since I didn't have the real thing

    IMG_1447-1.thumb.jpg.457911fd3315e3929469df8d8ba79789.jpg

    • Like 2
    • Sad 1
  6. Today was a rare chance to see Lady of Legend and Pendennis Castle in steam together (the former having spent most of the summer at Severn Valley).

    Unusually for me, I decided to go digital and took the 70D and a camcorder (maybe some video and more conventional loco portraits later).

    Reservoir on the Lady

    IMG_1383.thumb.jpg.2625fd2c1b9e2412088bacc1fae82776.jpg

    A wheelset from Maindy Hall:

    IMG_1483.thumb.jpg.9625f03f7a7a33ec047c54e94caa32fa.jpg

    This one would be a good "what is it". The inner cranks of Pendennis:

    IMG_1399.thumb.jpg.a9cf26e42dbb9a24ba6602ae373cddd1.jpg

    Inhomogenious

    IMG_1463.thumb.jpg.a330ed18f8a10c158c83a7fb130b4df0.jpg

    and this idea really went down the tubes (the atmospheric railway)

    IMG_1444.thumb.jpg.25fa20d2e6f6a6223b93e7ccd9cff07d.jpg

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...