Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

JamesT

Member
  • Posts

    1,698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    38

Posts posted by JamesT

  1. 2 hours ago, Hatter said:

    Hi James.  How do you convert your film images to digital for posting?  Scanned negatives or print first then scan the print? 

    I just scan the negatives, a flatbed for medium & large format and a film scanner for 35mm. (For colour I usually use the lab scans).

    Then tweak in RawTherapee.

     

    • Like 1
  2. Thanks everyone.

    I noticed the IR-ness too, but I'm not sure where it came from, the film was FP4+ which while it has good red sensitivity doesn't really go into the IR and none of the images used a red filter (1 & 3 were with CP to cut down the reflections looking into the Sun, and 2 didn't use a filter at all).

     

    • Like 1
  3. Mostly a test run with another new toy, a Bronica SQ-A (6x6 format camera, otherwise quite similar to the ETRS). The Letcombe Brook is a chalk stream that starts near Letcombe Basset and flows into the Childrey Brook just North of East Hanney.

    Letcombe Basset Cress Beds

    IMG_0001.thumb.jpg.9ed4cac620f61a17236ed0e929e45c23.jpg

    Two of the brook in the BBOWT Letcombe Valley reserve.

    IMG_0004.thumb.jpg.b422ed76908c4210983fd55f7522b58d.jpg

    IMG_0006.thumb.jpg.78c6044e2e7c4420c27fb479350edda2.jpg

    • Like 2
  4. The problem with the replacement sky is that the lighting direction becomes wrong on the planes. While it's not extreme, it is apparent on careful examination.

    This (I think) is probably the hardest thing to get right in composite images.

    • Like 2
  5. On 02/05/2023 at 23:47, Ryewolf said:

    Great to see these really old engines still running and in steam when so many were cut up for scrap.

    It's an interesting story. The Furness railway bought several of these 0-4-0 tender engines in the 1860's, but within 10 years they were obsolete, and so were sold to some of the local iron works as factory engines where they were converted to saddle tanks and worked for the better part of 100 years. The Furness Railway trust has two, this one and a slightly newer one that they are restoring to the saddle tank form. They're based in Preston at the Ribblesdale railway, but No. 20 spends most of the time touring.

  6. 23 hours ago, Clicker said:

    Well just goes to show ... size  doesn't matter ... you must be really pleased to see that  you've created a habitat  for that little newt ...

    Indeed, it was an exciting moment. I dug the pond about three years ago, in the hope that the frogs that I often saw in the garden would use it (as they have), but had no expectation that they would be joined by newts.

    • Like 1
  7. Another not-so-great quality shot from the pond, but a record shot of a first.

    DSCN3432.thumb.jpg.29289cf4d2480e580a620d568d7adfa4.jpg

    I'd just been carefully scraping some of the duckweed off (to avoid disturbing the frog spawn) and saw this fellow. There were at least two, but I couldn't get the phone to focus, and by the time I had got a proper camera one had hidden.

    • Like 3
  8. Great to see her with a bit of room to stretch her legs.

    A super set of an iconic engine, both as the start of the "Classic" Great Western look, and also as a magnificent example of reconstruction of a lost class.

    • Like 1
  9. 12 hours ago, Ryewolf said:

    makes me wonder just what happened...

    The beech fork had grown around the birch trunk, and then at some point the beech branch split away from its trunk and in the process shattered the birch tree. It was just chance that the bit of the birch embedded in the beech ended up close to the standing part. There were quite a few birch logs around from where it had shattered. I did take a shot at longer range but that's on the other camera that I had and I've not finished that film.

    • Like 1
  10. 1 hour ago, Clicker said:

    Sometimes folks have little knowledge of the work required to reproduce good images  for printing from slides and the sheer amount of work involved

    And even the most basic scans on a home scanner are monumentally tedious for any significant number as the slide have to be loaded individually.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...