Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Seascapes


MarkNI

Recommended Posts

I like all three - and no disrespect to Barbara's edit, but I actually like the dark brooding quality of the rocks in your original.

 

I have two small suggestions -

1. Would the first shot have been better framed a tad wider, to get the longhouse (bottom left) firmly within the composition?

2. Just wondering... in the 3rd shot, I see a slightly different composition, where the cliffs on the left aren't there, but the windlass thing is more to the right? This would have meant walking to the left a short distance. But that's just a "what if..", the shot's still good. 

Link to comment

Thanks Chris. I would have gone further right for the 3rd shot if I had boots on.  The water was sitting about an inch deep on the harbour!!

For the second I was doing a balancing act, but will be going back with a wider angle lens to try to get more of the scene in.

 

Thanks for the comment and idea

 

Barbara, thanks for the reworking.  I had started to lighten the rocks but it stopped resembling what I saw.  I do like what you did with it though, thanks!!

Link to comment

I have come back to this set more than once and each time I get......Itchy-Fingers.......I (like Barbara) ....want to lift shadows, to emphasise and to separate tones, and to nudge the colours.....not harshly but very subtly to lift the shots into another plane.

FUJI

Link to comment

I have come back to this set more than once and each time I get......Itchy-Fingers.......I (like Barbara) ....want to lift shadows, to emphasise and to separate tones, and to nudge the colours.....not harshly but very subtly to lift the shots into another plane.

FUJI

 

I think we've become spoiled by the achievements possible using HDR. We are in danger of seeing sharp contrast almost as an evil to be eliminated - yet surely there are times when it's the essential nature of the scene and shot, as here? I think it is absolutely right to take whatever measures to eliminate blown highlights, and perhaps SOMETIMES to lift shadows but at other times merely give a HINT of detail in them ... but too often (or so it seems to me) we want to iron out any and all extremes of contrast. 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...