Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 


kev7d

Recommended Posts

Thanks Chris. I don't mind the water effect in these with number 3 being on the limit for me and 1 being the best for me. I like the peat colour in the water of the first one.

1 was 0.3 sec, 2 was 0.4 sec and 3 was 0.5 sec.

Link to comment

love milky water...... :)

I've never thought of cropping in like this, might give it a go.

Why not give it a go. Thanks for looking Leon.

I prefer 1 too especially in the middle of the shot

Appreciated Chrissy.
Link to comment

Another milky water fan here and I have been known to use even longer shutter speeds.:)

 

One and three for me Kev with the proviso that in #1 I would have cropped the sky and vegitation out as it distracts from the water, same with #2 but this time the bottom out of focus rock, but that's just me.:)

Link to comment

Another milky water fan here and I have been known to use even longer shutter speeds. :)

 

I'm fascinated to know why? You look about the same age as me, i.e. both brought up with AP in the 70s and 80s, & learned that 1/15 or 1/30 were the ideal shutter speeds for putting motion blur into moving water. I never understood the modern fad for "freezing" water into a white curtain. I'm not sure what it's supposed to convey? Perhaps you can enlighten me! (And Fuji...)

Link to comment

Another milky water fan here and I have been known to use even longer shutter speeds.:)

 

One and three for me Kev with the proviso that in #1 I would have cropped the sky and vegitation out as it distracts from the water, same with #2 but this time the bottom out of focus rock, but that's just me.:)

Many thanks for looking and commenting Paul, really appreciate this. You may have a point about the sky in 1. :)

I think the rock in 2 looks out of focus because of the water running over the rock. :)

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...