Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Toned Cyanotype - Tulips


JMRead

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...

Odd to read the mixed reactions to these amazing pictures. I wonder if it is a product of the digital age that people don't like them? I appreciate that there is individual taste and that should be respected. However, this picture of Jims is showing what beauty there is in the heritage of photography. I only ever did standard darkroom work back in the day of film both in black and white and colour but mono was king and, for me, probably always will be.

By keeping the heritage methods alive, people remind us that photography is not all about how many megapixels we have or how much our camera cost. Photography is about art more than just recording images. All of the visual arts come under this umbrella of creating images not just recording scenes.

To lose our heritage and go mega realistic is akin to pulling down stone churches and building slab concrete ones. They would be more efficient, cost less for their upkeep but they would not have soul.

Working like this is not everyone's idea of fun but it is hard NOT to see the value and beauty in it.

Link to comment

Hello Graham and Hello Judy,

At the time I found the B&W P&D caper to be very good indeed I've always liked the DIY aspect of anything. Later the Blue Printing was quite good but now I think of it as as a blind alley.

In 1998 I came across the montages of Catherine McIntyre made in PS Ver.4 spent the next 14 years prevaricating and the last three after being so angry with my failure, teaching myself how to do them.

This for me is the new magic;

Many layers,

11t5x8x.jpg

Click image to view large


Fewer layers but getting nearer to what I really wanted to do, though I didn't realise it at the time,

qywqpe.jpg

Click image to view large


Finally realising that I could make an image with the figure in my imagination,

1zgge8m.jpg

Click image to view large


So here I am now freed from the constraints of making figure in the landscape images on site. I think back to the likes of Anne Brigman (my mentor) 100 years ago who would have loved Photoshop, to Ansel Adams who would have written his own version and to Minor White who would have intellectualised the whole process :-)

Cheers - Jim
 

 

Link to comment

Oh my! I have so much to learn. I saw somewhere that you should study early photographers and photography if you want to move forward. I couldn't see it then but I can now. Many thanks for opening my eyes.

Link to comment

Odd to read the mixed reactions to these amazing pictures. I wonder if it is a product of the digital age that people don't like them? I appreciate that there is individual taste and that should be respected. However, this picture of Jims is showing what beauty there is in the heritage of photography. I only ever did standard darkroom work back in the day of film both in black and white and colour but mono was king and, for me, probably always will be.

 

I agree wholeheartedly. But don't forget that probably a lot of home enthusiasts were in my position - B&W D&P was relatively easy to do, so we concentrated on that. Colour, on the other hand, required a whole new discipline plus quite a lot of extra equipment. I never did get around to it, and preferred to shoot transparency film, e.g. Kodachrome, and let the labs get on with it. The nearest I got to it was processing colour negs onto special B&W paper, which gave a rather interesting grainy monochrome print.

Link to comment

Hello Graham,

 

A good place to start is the Photo Secession and a Magazine called Camera Work started by Alfred Steiglitz in the early 1900's, various publishers have made books about the movement it being a pivotal point in photography that can be seen in the images we produce today.

 

It's such great fun finding out about all this :-)

 

Cheers - Jim

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...