Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Dynamic Range and Noise


Recommended Posts

Very surprising! From that, one would expect camera software writers to program for the maximum signal at all times, especially in P mode. Perhaps some do understand this, and that would certainly deliver less noisy pictures on the face of it. The only flaw in the logic is that more the signal increases (via wider apertures or slower shutter speeds) then the ISO should REDUCE to compensate.

Link to comment

when i was first starting out with nightscapes some mystic man in the tetons who i just happened to run into told me to bump up my iso to 3200 instead of trying to shoot at iso 200.  i thought it was a stupid idea, but i obligingly shot off a few rounds with a high iso.  found out in the hotel room later that he wasn't full of crap.  he told me the sensor doesn't heat up as much with the shorter shutter speed, a hotter sensor causes more noise.  here's the image i made the night i met him around oxbow bend.  it was the first milky way shot that i was happy with.

32648250124_75d8633cb0_o.jpg

Link to comment
35 minutes ago, Clicker said:

Proof of the pudding eh ..

thats a cracking Milky Way Beth.

 I must try some nightscapes later this year...  It's not  something I have ever attempted...  

thanks.  it's so easy you'll be wondering why you've never tried before.

Link to comment

I have to say I tend not too think about noise too much these days.  I used to think I had to keep my camera on the lowest ISO setting.  How liberating it was when I started to use higher ISO.  It brought me a load of new opportunities and freedom.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
On 25 March 2017 at 14:41, kev7d said:

I have to say I tend not too think about noise too much these days.  I used to think I had to keep my camera on the lowest ISO setting.  How liberating it was when I started to use higher ISO.  It brought me a load of new opportunities and freedom.  

It was no different in film days. Newbies and manufacturers went for the "least grain" option at all times. However, the best photographers used film grain to great creative effect when the situation called for it. Especially in B&W photography.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...