Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Newbridge


JamesT

Recommended Posts

Took the Minolta on a walk along the Thames Path last weekend, with a selection of primes rather than the usual 35-70 zoom (partly because I just got a 135mm f2.8 MC). But this one is with the 50mm F1.7 MD that I got with the camera. The bridge carries the A415 over the Thames, I'd just had lunch at the pub on the right. That there is a hostelry on each side, but no settlement suggest that in the 17th Century (or thereabouts) this was a difficult crossing. The name also suggests that perhaps it was once a ford.

IMG_0028x.jpg

And after cloning out the traffic lights:

IMG_0028xc.jpg

Ilford FP4+ developed in Rodinal

Link to comment
  • 1 month later...

If by 'better' you mean 'more contrast', then undoubtedly. But that's the beauty of FP4 - the low contrast brings out maximum detail. If you look under the left hand bridge arch you can see every detail of the weeping willow, where in the scan half of that is lost to shadow.

Link to comment
On 13/12/2016 at 18:08, ChrisLumix said:

If by 'better' you mean 'more contrast', then undoubtedly. But that's the beauty of FP4 - the low contrast brings out maximum detail. If you look under the left hand bridge arch you can see every detail of the weeping willow, where in the scan half of that is lost to shadow.

On reviewing it, yes I think I did overcook the contrast. I guess in the resolutions available here the big difference in focus is less evident. 

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...