fuzzyedges

Or is there more photographically speaking vs whistles and shiny things

I have to admit I often wonder why all those settings I never use are there for When I shoot at an event you dont have time to alter much hence I set my aperture to f4 / f5.6 (zoom lens) speed does what it wants and its only the iso thats altered to the day light available The rest is up to soft ware on the computer Would I buy a one cost vs head NO heart vs head you bet I would

Might cost abit but lets be fair some are offering free postage

Less is better but will the gadget people (them with money) warm to the absence of toys

What uncle hamish with his wooden leg he is quite cuddly works part time in M&S as a meeter and greeter and the rest of the time as a pole dancer at Kinsley dog track I have a personalized number plate and never thought of being pretentious, must give it some thought so I can live up to that But then I have never thought of people who dont have them as sheep

I bet one sides full of flat hats and whippets

Hi there from someone on the correct side of the hill

Hi there You certainly live where the landscapes are(next to Yorkshire that is) Looking forward to images

new luminex http://www.engadget.com/2015/07/16/panasonic-lumix-gx8/

Play nicely children Lets put all the toys back in the box

His head might have not been but his body was very stiff the next day Still it was better than his engine as that is one down to honda only 4 left now of course the rest of the car is scrap

Its a monumental force relating to deacceleration Here is the tech bit relating to sainz crash in Sochi http://www.topgear.com/car-news/crash/f1-just-how-big-was-sainzs-46g-sochi-crash-we-do-maths

Maybe that should have been a big G (bigger grammes?)

Fia investigating Alonso's seat it broke under 46g load http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns33398.html

Foe anyone that follows F1 this was probably the worst looking crash for a long time Ive ever seen Here are the stills and how they were taken http://espn.go.com/f1/story/_/id/15081902/f1-life-lens-fernando-alonso-crash Very good images of a split second incident it shows how luck and forward planning go hand in hand

Ah the Q5000 telemecanique variable speed AC drive now schnieder what would we do without the germans Q450? not heard of those

Hi bille Welcome aboard you wont find a more friendly forum Some of us are odd weird / daft but defiantly friendly

Works for me

I agree with you Paul What is probably being said is to comply strictly with the rule of thirds could produce some grotty images All the rules need a good looking at and also why you like a particular image/images then you start to train your eye and brain into looking for images that suit you and to find the best position to take them from rather than that looks nice click, which nearly always leads to the "I wish I had ......" statement

Any help to you bt guys http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2016/02/02/bt-broadband-suffers-major-outage-across-uk/

The fact they went for the photographer rather than thompsons showed a lack of skill in extracting cash

I dont think the beef is with the daily fail its with the photographer who didnt get a model release for the horse and thompsons for printing it without checking It may fall apart as it is a horse

If the story is true (daily mail fantasy?) I find it disturbing that Thompsons are looking into it if a formal complaint is received

you are sitting on onions? they will never hatch