UV filter for 16-35 f4L IS

[Rick448]

Hi all,

I have ordered a 16-35 f4L IS lens and have a 70-200 2.8L IS II and am looking to get UV filters for these. I'd prefer not to lose any stops by fitting these so wondered if anyone could recommend me some filters?

Thanks all.

[Black Pearl]

You don't actually need a UV filter as digital cameras aren't affected by UV light in the same way as film was/is. You can get just a clear protection filter though a UV is more common so there's more choice. None of them have any filter factor so you won't lose light by having one on.

 

Personally I wouldn't bother as I don't see there's any point in adding another bit of (typically poorer quality) glass to your lens. A lens cap and lens hood are far better at protecting the front element - particularly the 70-200mm - and you already have them. If you shoot in adverse conditions, beach with wind, waterfall with spray then a filter might (might) be a handy thing to have in your bag to fit - shoot - remove but its not something I would recommend leaving on.

 

If you are looking for one then the Hoya Pro1 Digital range would be a good place to start. 

[Rick448]

Many thanks. I was looking as Canon recommend one for dust protection. To be fair I won't be shooting in adverse conditions so maybe I won't bother. I'll look at the Hoya ones you suggest though.

Cheers.

[ChrisLumix]

If you want to protect the lens with a decent filter, why not get a polariser? 

 

As for UV, you can apply the effect of these (if required) in software like Photoshop.

[Rick448]

If you want to protect the lens with a decent filter, why not get a polariser?

As for UV, you can apply the effect of these (if required) in software like Photoshop.

Won't a polariser reduce the light and therefore partially negate he advantage of a reasonably fast lens?

[Black Pearl]

Yep - a CPL reduces light so its a put on for a specific purpose then take off filter not a leave on all the time filter.

 

I do know that with certain Canon lenses they are only water resistant with a filter in pace so it might be worth checking your instructions - assuming you're going to get it wet.

[ChrisLumix]

Won't a polariser reduce the light and therefore partially negate he advantage of a reasonably fast lens?

 

Only in the 'polarising' position - turned through 90º they don't operate and don't impede light.

[Black Pearl]

Sorry but that simply isn't true.

A polarising filter is dark grey and therefore has a filter factor regardless of where you turn it - usually 1.5 to 2 stops.