Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Almost everythings going online?


Guest DaveW

Recommended Posts

They were saying on the radio this morning Fuzzy that the productivity of the British worker is on average only half that of the American one. I can only presume that is not because they work a lot harder, but their industry is more mechanised and computerised. However unless you keep increasing consumption, simply keep increasing productivity in the end means more unemployment, even though theoretically an exporting country may get richer through it.

 

The only way to sop up the unemployed then will be to ban overtime and shorten the working week, having two people employed half of the week each instead of one full time as now.  However to bring that about government taxation, pensions systems and employers insurance would need to be changed so it is no dearer for an employer to employ two people half a week each rather than just one for a whole week. Meaning these costs would need to be levied on each hour an employee worked, not per individual employee. At the moment the tax, pensions and employers insurance schemes mean it is cheaper to employ one person on overtime than employ another worker, or even better put a machine in to replace workers and avoid most of these costs. When a machine becomes redundant it may have a second-hand or scrap value for the firm. When a worker is made redundant it costs the firm money to get rid of them so the choice is obvious.

 

Still the fact the populations getting older with more retiring from the labour market and less young workers coming along may mean increasing use of the Internet, mechanisation and computerisation requiring fewer workers will be an advantage after all in order to keep up the same levels of production and feed and clothe everybody. Otherwise we may have seen the situation, due to mechanisation and computerisation, where the more people are made redundant being replaced by technology, the more productive our industry becomes and the better our balance of payments. Obviously in the end the world can only go on increasing production so far before industry has to cut back because it is destroying the planet and it's natural resources.

 

Even in China the population is evidently getting older and they too are wondering if they will have enough younger workers to support the elderly in their old age, so mechanisation and computerisation will become a necessity for industry. Possibly there will need to be some form of redistribution of wealth earned by industry employing proportionately fewer people in the future Fuzzy, maybe through some form of new company taxation?

 

Also too much supposed job security can be a problem regarding employment (as in France).  An employer will often pass up contracts rather than employ additional workers if they are too hard to get rid of if the market changes (again the French with their car firms). When my father started in the Building Trade an employer could sack you at four hours notice with no redundancy pay. It was not unknown for a worker in his trade to have two employers in a day as they simply went down the road if made redundant in the morning and got set on at the next site, since if an employer could get rid of them easily if they proved useless they were more willing to take people on. Of course the professions had the luxury of requiring I think it was a fortnight's notice in those days, rather than four hours! What is certain is the world is changing and the traditional forms of employment will have to change too, or Britain will continue to decline in the modern world.

Edited by DaveW
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...