Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

roicead

Member
  • Posts

    202
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

roicead last won the day on April 6 2017

roicead had the most liked content!

Reputation

130

About roicead

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Delaware
  • Allow members to edit my images for critique purposes only
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

715 profile views
  1. i have a lot of issues with the green details. it wasn't so bad with the x-t1, but with the x-t2 there's a very noticeable difference in the rendering of foliage and the dreaded worms. i noticed it in almost all of my photos from vacation last fall. and when i say noticed, it was evident just looking at the images, not zoomed in to 100%.
  2. welcome back to the wonderful world of fuji. i love my fuji x cameras. but i also love lightroom. and i can't get the two to play nicely so i went back to canon. keeping the fuji just in case. it's a shame too because fuji and lightroom would be my perfect setup.
  3. nice one, congrats!
  4. ghost recon dark waters by tom clancy. goes with the new ghost recon video game.
  5. thanks everyone. this is a pleasant surprise after a busy weekend!
  6. yea, i realized that not long after i posted and saw the grip in the pic was weird. i've already edited my post.
  7. i never really cared much for the quality of bokeh on the 100-400mm. but the teleconverters are a pain in the butt. they work with some lenses, they only work with manual focus on others and then they don't work at all with others, and that's with the canon tc's. i did post a short review and an image taken with the 100-400mm, but since i'm on midnight shift and can't manage to read correctly i just realized that you're looking at the cosina rather than the canon. i haven't used the cosina so i can't comment. a tc might work for awhile, but make sure it'll work with your 70-200mm f/4.
  8. thanks. it's so easy you'll be wondering why you've never tried before.
  9. when i was first starting out with nightscapes some mystic man in the tetons who i just happened to run into told me to bump up my iso to 3200 instead of trying to shoot at iso 200. i thought it was a stupid idea, but i obligingly shot off a few rounds with a high iso. found out in the hotel room later that he wasn't full of crap. he told me the sensor doesn't heat up as much with the shorter shutter speed, a hotter sensor causes more noise. here's the image i made the night i met him around oxbow bend. it was the first milky way shot that i was happy with.
  10. roicead

    POTW - 19/3/2017

    excellent choice!
  11. a lot of it also depends on the flow of the water. yes, you might get a fair amount of blur with 1/2 sec on a large waterfall that's reached maximum velocity with the help of gravity. on a slow trickling creek you might need 5 minutes. on a raindrop sliding down your car after the rain has ended you might lose to evaporation. this was a slow trickle during a drought, the water on the rocks in the foreground is usually about a foot deep, it was just a few inches when i was there.. chris, i think you're seeing a large amount of white because you're looking at such a small area. look at these photos close up and you'll see details, ebbs and flows around where rocks jut out, pathways taken by the water or trails where leaves or other debris passed through. that's the one place where digital fails, if everyone's looking at a 900px size photo on a computer screen they only see the big picture and don't see the smaller details like you'd see on a 16x20" print.
×
×
  • Create New...