Caz

red to black blue to bits

is there any point in using this with your average dslr as i would have thought the fps would be too slow?

not my photograph but its a cracker >

I have a pair of sennheiser hd600's and there is a big difference between an £80 pair and a £300 pair. Lossless audio files rather than standard mp3's make a difference too.

I did have my phone but I'd just finished a 14 hour night shift and didn't think to use it!

Finished work quite late this morning and as I was driving home noticed the clouds turning slightly pink and thought this was going to be a nice sunrise, the camera and tripod were in the car so I drove to Saltburn parked up and and walked down tto he beach armed with my camera. 15 minutes later a spectacular sunrise bright fiery clouds, stunning, Turned the camera on all excited! And discovered I'd left the memory card in the laptop! Swearing followed! Note to self - remember the 6 p's perfect planning prevents pi** poor performance!

if you're worse at night FUJI I use an oil burner with a tea light in but instead of oil use water and menthol crystals, fills the room with menthol!

Saxon

Fitters

Tatters

Batters

Sorry - Nutters

Nutter

If i had the 18-55 id go with the 50 or the 80 for the extra focal range.

My Merry xmas present to me is a north face mountain 35 tent for when the weather gets truly horrid

looks more like a immature thrush than a blackbird

I agree the 500d is a bargain

A new camera that allows you to change focus after taking the shot! http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-30437280

Some very reasonable prices

Interesting article, Really Fancy one of these tablets capable of running full versions of Lightroom and Photoshop. Interesting tether feature too. http://photography.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tethering-a-dslr-camera-to-a-microsoft-surface-pro-tablet-with-a-usb-cable--photo-13525

Blues

Lamb

Hi Bill and thankyou very much for the reply and the images. Id looked at the 10-22mm as i wanted an ultra wide lens for landscapes. Nice photos BIll and im going to go with the 10-22mm the 17-40 wasn't as wide as i ideally wanted but i thought if the quality was far superior id make do. Thanks BIll

Ive been looking at wide lenses for a few days as im wanting to upgrade my 18-55 on my Canon 60d. Ideally i was thinking of an L series lens for the better image quality but i dont want a fisheye so i have been looking at a Canon ef 17-40 F4 L but on my 60d it will be roughly 28-65mm, Ive read loads of reviews some say its an excellent lens, some say its good on a full frame body and some say its mediocre on a modern APSC body. Does anybody use this lens on an APSC body and whats your opinion of it Am i wasting money buying a L series when i should just buy an ef-s lens Please help

I'm looking around for a new lens at the moment and came across this site, thought some of you might be interested http://www.thelensdoctor.co.uk/index.html