Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Sharpening - is it necessary?


Recommended Posts

I've never bothered with sharpening for images that are to be displayed on a monitor, but I was reading yesterday that it should be considered a necessity for all images.

 

Any comments, hints, suggestions or advice before I attempt to get a bit sharper?

 

Korky

Link to comment

I've never bothered with sharpening for images that are to be displayed on a monitor, but I was reading yesterday that it should be considered a necessity for all images.

 

Any comments, hints, suggestions or advice before I attempt to get a bit sharper?

 

Korky

 

Having spent the last couple of weeks at dpreview mulling over my recent camera upgrade and all the debates there, I now feel we get ridiculously obsessed with the whole idea of sharpness. It really doesn't matter, folks!! Ok, I know from my old archive that images can be too soft, but it's a too-little debated fact that they can be too sharp too. 

 

Where did you read this clownish statement?

Link to comment

My eldest son say's that we should get it right in the camera...

Well  if that means the basics like composition, exposure and lighting then I'd agree.

 

But if every thing in camera should be right without editing then you would be changing setting for nearly every exposure and you may as well shoot raw like I do and apply the setting at the conversion stage rather than let the camera do it.

 

For example changing the sharpening setting to one that's suitable for the subject ( more for landscapes less for portraits), changing the contrast setting depending on the contrast of scene, a very low contrast scene will require the contrast setting to be increased or a flat image will result and vice versa. White balance needs to be manual and changed  every time the lighting changes after all auto white balance is not fool proof.

 

Of course most people will use the standard settings and let/hope the camera's computer will get it right, but then that's not really you getting it right in camera is it. ;)

Edited by OlyPaul
Link to comment

My eldest son say's that we should get it right in the camera...

 

I think that's a good principle. And if certain adjustments need to be made, the menu for them can be added either to your QuickMenu, or assigned to a function button.

 

That's not to say that PP is wrong, just that if it can be got right in-camera, how much later time it saves!

Link to comment

This started as a 16 million pixel DNG 9RAW) file from the Pentax.

 

I cropped it 1:1 then added my border and resampled it down to 800x800 pixels for the web. 

The one on the left has been left at that point and to be fair its not bad - the one on the right has been sharpened to make it 'pop' once it has been saved as a JPEG and hosted (here) online. 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

RAW files need to be sharpened twice.

They need capture sharpening when the data is first opened (by default your RAW software will do this but you can tweak it) then output sharpening once you've fully processed the image and sized it.

Sharpening is a Bourgiois Concept BP ;-)

Seriously though it is essential that RAW files are sharpened .....my current favourite method is using the...High-Pass Filter......it takes some learning but is amazing if applied in selected areas.

FUJI

Edited by FUJI
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...