Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Time Stands Still For No Man


CanonChrissy

Recommended Posts

Works for me - and I like the B&W.

 

I did two seconds in one, a few years ago, but that was a pure straight shot in which I got lucky when the finger moved at just the right speed to catch it in two places!

 

Paul.

Link to comment

This is a combination of several images, each taken one second apart then layered one over the other, to show the seconds ticking by. Thanks for looking.

 

I like it. Just one question - how did you avoid blur in the minute hand over the near half minute of real time involved? It should have moved noticeably.

Link to comment

It did blur ever so slightly, but I managed to put it right via erasing each second hand as I went, so only the original 'bottom layer' showed through. Not sure If i explained that properly, do you understand what I mean?

 

Yes perfectly - but I think you meant 'erase everything EXCEPT the second hand as you went'?

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...