1941 mk1 Hillman Utility

[colinb]

Photographed last Monday, raw conversion with a bit of dabbling in Photoshop.

 

Best Viewed Large

 

[Denis]

The once ubiquitous 'tilly', a good all round vehicle used by all of the British forces in WWII....nice shot Colin

[fuzzyedges]

I like the processing colin a bit unreal but it makes the image

[colinb]

I like the processing colin a bit unreal but it makes the image

 

not sure what you mean with 'unreal' Fuzzy? 

[fuzzyedges]

not sure what you mean with 'unreal' Fuzzy? 

A kind of hdr feel but its still a good image

[Korky]

The processing looks just about right to me - not sure what the fuzzmeister means about HDR, it just looks very nicely done through my specs.

 

Korky

[ChrisLumix]

The processing looks just about right to me - not sure what the fuzzmeister means about HDR, it just looks very nicely done through my specs.

 

Korky

 

I think I can see - it has that ever-so-slightly unreal look that HDR processing gives, i.e. it slightly baffles the eye which would not have seen the subject in that way. It's a good study though.

[colinb]

I think I can see - it has that ever-so-slightly unreal look that HDR processing gives, i.e. it slightly baffles the eye which would not have seen the subject in that way. It's a good study though.

 

But isn't that part of 'photography'? Macro, fish eye lens, infra red, panoramic pictures, street photography, architectural, mono, etc all show what you don't really see.

[fuzzyedges]

But isn't that part of 'photography'? Macro, fish eye lens, infra red, panoramic pictures, street photography, architectural, mono, etc all show what you don't really see.

Exactly which is what I said in my first post

For unreal you could use unusual diffrent special and a whole host of adjectives

[colinb]

Exactly which is what I said in my first post

 

 

 and I wasn't disagreeing with you Fuzzy .. or Chris 

[fuzzyedges]

 and I wasn't disagreeing with you Fuzzy .. or Chris 

No It was me agreeing with your post 

I would have used big letters if I was being argumentitive (which I never am)

[ChrisLumix]

But isn't that part of 'photography'? Macro, fish eye lens, infra red, panoramic pictures, street photography, architectural, mono, etc all show what you don't really see.

 

Well yes. It just looks processed, that's all, which a straight OOC image wouldn't in all probability. That's not to say one way is better than another, just that the brain can always tell when something is enhanced in some way.