Jump to content

Hi to all our members ... We  would just like to draw your attention to the latest post on the following link... Thank you for your attention .If you have already responded to my note  on Chatbox  about this please ignore this sticky note ... Thanks  folks ....

http://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/46369-important~-the-forum-its-future-and-finances/

Clicker and Ryewolf   ADMIN TEAM 

Regretfully we have to once again ask members for  some financial support in order to  keep TIPF  running till December 2023. The more pledges we have to become  FRIEND OF THE FORUM  the less the individual cost will be so  if you want this Forum to continue  please follow the link below  and decide  if you are able to  support us . Thank you all for your support in the past ... it has been appreciated  a great deal ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-important-notice/

 Clicker and Ryewolf  ...  Admin Team 

Hi TIPFers 

I AM HERE AGAIN WITH THE  BEGGING BOWL TO ENSURE THE FORUM CAN KEEP GOING ... Please follow  below if you want to  support the continuation  of this Forum and  this  small but friendly community. 

As always your support is  both vital and appreciated ...

 Clicker and Ryewolf ...

https://www.tipf.co.uk/forums/topic/57184-202223-forum-finances-update-4th-july-2023/

 

Fleetwood Anchorage


johntwo

Recommended Posts

Taken on a Ross Ensign Selfix folding camera loaded (almost certainly) with long defunct Ilford FP3 (always better in Acutol than FP4 ).  Scanned from the negative on an Epson Scanner.

(This one definitely needs viewing in Litebox to crisp it up.)

633840319_FleeetwoodAnchorage.thumb.jpg.57d23e6717f62653c709fa0d5ec4976f.jpg

Link to comment

It's not clear if this is a recent shot with very expired film (FP3 was discontinued in 1968), a "found film" (i.e. film that was shot long ago but only developed recently) or a scan of a negative that was shot and processed back in the 60's.

But whichever, I like the result.

Link to comment

Thanks James.  It's an old 6x9 neg from the days when I used to do a lot of wet darkroom work.  Almost certainly from the late 60's early 70's.  I've still got the camera and keep meaning to use it but these days, I would have the film commercially processed.

Link to comment
5 minutes ago, johntwo said:

I've still got the camera and keep meaning to use it but these days, I would have the film commercially processed.

If the bellows are still light proof, then it will most likely still take very nice photos. I think that 6x9 images often have a depth to them that feels more like large format than the smaller medium formats (let alone 35mm or digital sensors).

Link to comment

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...